Kenya today finds itself at a crossroads of economic vision. On one side is EVOLVE, the people-first economic model spearheaded by Prof. Fred Ogola and the Hekima Alliance Party (HAPA). On the other is BETA, the Bottom-Up Economic Transformation Agenda, which is the sitting government’s official economic program integrated into the Fourth Medium Term Plan of Vision 2030.
While both frameworks share the goal of improving livelihoods and steering Kenya toward inclusive growth, they differ sharply in narrative, focus, and implementation pathways. This article compares the two frameworks, identifies their strengths and weaknesses, and offers practical recommendations for policymakers, strategists, and political actors navigating Kenya’s economic future.
EVOLVE: A People-First, Welfare-Centered Blueprint
EVOLVE is presented as an alternative political-economic roadmap designed to break Kenya’s cycle of elite capture. It builds on six pillars:
-
Economic turnaround
-
Value generation
-
Talent optimisation
-
Strategic partnerships
-
Vulnerability management
-
Environmental stewardship
The model positions itself as a welfare-centered approach that speaks directly to households struggling with unemployment, debt, and rising living costs. EVOLVE’s framing is moral as much as it is economic — it promises justice for the “looted majority,” those who have historically been excluded from Kenya’s economic growth story.
However, while the narrative is powerful, the details of its financing remain thin. Without concrete fiscal models, EVOLVE risks being dismissed as aspirational rather than actionable.
BETA: Government’s Value-Chain-Led Transformation
The Bottom-Up Economic Transformation Agenda (BETA) is the government’s operational economic plan. Anchored in Vision 2030 and rolled out through the Fourth Medium Term Plan, BETA prioritises:
-
Value-chain-led transformation in agriculture and manufacturing
-
Inclusive green growth and climate resilience
-
Job creation through micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs)
-
Expansion of productive capacity across counties
-
Cost-of-living reduction through targeted fiscal and policy reforms
BETA’s strength lies in its institutionalisation. It is already embedded in national budgets, state programs, and county-level interventions, which makes it more politically feasible and financially backed. The trade-off, however, is that it risks becoming overly technocratic, with less emphasis on the justice and equity narrative that EVOLVE foregrounds.
Direct Comparison: EVOLVE vs. BETA
| Dimension | EVOLVE (Prof. Ogola / HAPA) | BETA (Government) |
|---|---|---|
| Primary thesis | People-first welfare, anti-capture reforms, rebuilding industries, protecting vulnerable groups. | Productivity-driven, value-chain-led national transformation anchored in budgets and MTP-IV. |
| Target beneficiaries | Youth, women, stressed households, marginalised regions, “the looted majority.” | Sectors with high spillovers — agriculture, MSMEs, green economy, manufacturing. |
| Implementation vehicle | Political movement + HAPA platform; promises systemic reform and welfare delivery. | Ministries, county governments, public programs, and state budgets already underway. |
| Financing model | Not fully defined; rhetoric on ethical investment and resource redirection. Risks fiscal gaps. | Public resources, donor programs, private sector participation, fiscal reforms. |
| Political feasibility | Ambitious, but untested at scale; dependent on reform capacity and party traction. | Politically viable as government policy; limited by fiscal constraints and political trade-offs. |
| Distinct advantage | Compelling moral narrative of justice and inclusion; grassroots mobilisation potential. | Institutional muscle: aligned with budgets, ministries, and county structures for delivery. |
Strategic Strengths and Weaknesses
EVOLVE
Strengths
-
Powerful moral and justice-oriented narrative that resonates with communities, youth, and civil society.
-
Holistic pillars that combine economic, social, and environmental concerns, appealing to diverse constituencies including faith groups and NGOs.
Weaknesses
-
Execution gap: lacks detailed financing and implementation strategies, raising doubts about feasibility.
-
Institutional friction: success would require sweeping civil service reforms and strong anti-corruption systems to avoid elite capture.
BETA
Strengths
-
Institutionalised within government planning and budget frameworks, ensuring feasibility.
-
Targets high-impact sectors, making it easier to attract finance and partnerships.
Weaknesses
-
Risks being perceived as technocratic and detached from everyday struggles.
-
Vulnerable to political trade-offs and austerity measures that may weaken its impact.
Recommendations: Turning Strategy into Action
-
Adopt a Bridge Strategy:
Demonstrate EVOLVE’s value by piloting 2–3 BETA-aligned projects — such as agriculture value chains or green jobs — but deliver them under EVOLVE’s governance model (faster disbursement, transparency dashboards, citizen oversight). -
Publish a Financing Plan:
Create a 3-year fiscal model with specific costings and funding sources: domestic revenue reprioritisation, concessional finance, blended finance, and diaspora bonds. Numbers give credibility. -
Institutionalise Anti-Capture Tools:
Introduce citizen oversight boards, open procurement dashboards, and independent forensic audits. Pilot these on existing BETA projects to prove EVOLVE’s governance advantage. -
Pilot in Two Counties:
Run 6–12 month county pilots (one agrarian, one urban) to show measurable outcomes: jobs created, poverty reduction, environmental protection. An independent third-party evaluation will boost credibility. -
Build Partnerships:
Sign MOUs with county governments, local financial institutions, and CSOs to share risk and credibility. Leverage BETA’s infrastructure while differentiating EVOLVE’s governance. -
Track Six KPIs:
-
Jobs created
-
% procurement awarded to local MSMEs
-
Poverty reduction in pilot areas
-
Environmental gains (reforestation, safeguards)
-
Procurement transparency score
-
Fiscal return on projects
-
Tactical Communications & Political Posture
For maximum impact, EVOLVE should not position itself as anti-BETA. Instead, it should present itself as complementary, offering governance solutions that accelerate citizen benefits. This reduces political friction and opens space for co-implementation. The key is evidence — showcasing through pilots how EVOLVE delivers faster, more equitably, and with measurable results.
One-Page Action Plan (0–180 Days)
-
0–30 days: Draft financial model and KPI scorecard; select two pilot counties.
-
30–90 days: Sign MOUs, launch pilots, release baseline and procurement dashboards.
-
90–180 days: Commission independent evaluation, publish midline results, and use evidence to push for adoption in MTP/BPS processes.
EVOLVE has political energy and moral power; BETA has institutional strength and budget muscle. Kenya’s opportunity lies not in choosing one over the other but in combining both: using BETA’s delivery systems to demonstrate EVOLVE’s governance superiority.
If EVOLVE can prove, through credible pilots and transparent financing, that it delivers more effectively to citizens, it will move from being a slogan to a scalable policy alternative with genuine political traction.